nk2006
11-12 10:14 AM
Hi California members,
There is an IV action item to fight recent practice of USCIS in denying I485 applications in some AC21 cases. For more info, please visit:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22182
It’s a serious issue which can affect many of us, please act now and send letters (letter formats and everything else is ready in the thread quoted above). It will only take a few minutes of your time.
State chapter leader,
Please try to bring attention of your state members to this IV core approved effort.
Thank you.
There is an IV action item to fight recent practice of USCIS in denying I485 applications in some AC21 cases. For more info, please visit:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22182
It’s a serious issue which can affect many of us, please act now and send letters (letter formats and everything else is ready in the thread quoted above). It will only take a few minutes of your time.
State chapter leader,
Please try to bring attention of your state members to this IV core approved effort.
Thank you.
wallpaper Shadow for lue eyes
sganny
03-01 12:46 AM
Hi,
I am on H1 visa and my wife is on H4. Our son was born here last summer with multiple complications, a few of them were life threatening as well. He is recovering well from multiple surgeries but still has issues that require constant medical attention. It is possible that I might be laid off soon and while I am searching hard to find a new job, it is possible that I might have to leave the country to avoid being out of status. With my son's current health condition, my preference is to stay here for some more years till he is completely out of the woods. I wanted to get expert advice from lawyers/members of IV as to what my options are? Will writing to my local senator and asking for a visa that will allow me to stay here even if I lose my job, an option? If so what visa would that be? I have another daughter who is on H4 as well. If we have to convert to b1/b2, is it straightforward and once on b1/b2, can I convert to H1 if I get another job? Are there provisions for parents to get green card based on a sick US citizen child?
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
I am on H1 visa and my wife is on H4. Our son was born here last summer with multiple complications, a few of them were life threatening as well. He is recovering well from multiple surgeries but still has issues that require constant medical attention. It is possible that I might be laid off soon and while I am searching hard to find a new job, it is possible that I might have to leave the country to avoid being out of status. With my son's current health condition, my preference is to stay here for some more years till he is completely out of the woods. I wanted to get expert advice from lawyers/members of IV as to what my options are? Will writing to my local senator and asking for a visa that will allow me to stay here even if I lose my job, an option? If so what visa would that be? I have another daughter who is on H4 as well. If we have to convert to b1/b2, is it straightforward and once on b1/b2, can I convert to H1 if I get another job? Are there provisions for parents to get green card based on a sick US citizen child?
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
GCBy3000
07-27 10:50 AM
People who are in US just for conversion rate can now think of this move. I USD = 39.4 INR, 1 Canadian $ = 37.xx. Not a big difference.
2011 a heavy black eye shadow
vikasgarg24
08-04 02:39 PM
You dont need to file 485 again. after i140 approval send a email to SC and they will include new I-140 and Labor in 485
more...
smccrea
03-01 03:04 PM
Is an employee who resigns entitled to relocation expenses like the employee who is laid off?
krishna_brc
07-02 05:41 PM
I am in the same state as your's. After talking with Lawyer and after reading lot of forums, i went ahead and submitted with PAR:PAROLEE for both Manner of Last Entry and Current Immigration status.
I am not lawyer :) but that's waht i went with and submitted just yesterday
I am in the same boat. I entered PAR:PAROLEE and my Advance Parole got approved, waiting for EAD approval.
I am not lawyer :) but that's waht i went with and submitted just yesterday
I am in the same boat. I entered PAR:PAROLEE and my Advance Parole got approved, waiting for EAD approval.
more...
jsb
09-05 10:09 PM
Hi,
I am writing here for the first time.
My checks got encashed only for EAD/AP.
I filed concurrently I140/485 and PD is 2006.
Can some one tell if this is normal?
Thanks
This is thread for I-485 status check with USCIS customer service !!!
I am writing here for the first time.
My checks got encashed only for EAD/AP.
I filed concurrently I140/485 and PD is 2006.
Can some one tell if this is normal?
Thanks
This is thread for I-485 status check with USCIS customer service !!!
2010 eye makeup for lue eyes.
arihant
09-13 11:53 AM
Looks like EB2 India took a backward step. Not sure of the other categories as I am more interested in this category.
more...
Ram_C
11-02 05:49 PM
Here's a sticky question - and appreciate "expert" advise on the matter:
My situation:
1. I currently work on a H1B for Company A
2. My future greencard has been filed by Company B - recd. EAD, applied 485
My question:
1. Can I work on my EAD either for company A or any other company?
Yes, you can work for any company, but with similar job description mentioned in your LC
2. What happens if I dont join Company B ever?
well this is a broad subject, I'll try to put it this way.
when you applied for AOS which I suppose is employment based, your intent is to work with the sponsoring employer on a "permanent position" (at least 6 months after the GC approval) and your sponsoring employers intent is to employee you on permanent position (again atleast 6 months after GC approval), so by never joining your sponsoring employer you are violating/contradicting the primary intent of Employment based AOS application which can lead to revoking of your GC in future or it might cause problems during your naturalization
My situation:
1. I currently work on a H1B for Company A
2. My future greencard has been filed by Company B - recd. EAD, applied 485
My question:
1. Can I work on my EAD either for company A or any other company?
Yes, you can work for any company, but with similar job description mentioned in your LC
2. What happens if I dont join Company B ever?
well this is a broad subject, I'll try to put it this way.
when you applied for AOS which I suppose is employment based, your intent is to work with the sponsoring employer on a "permanent position" (at least 6 months after the GC approval) and your sponsoring employers intent is to employee you on permanent position (again atleast 6 months after GC approval), so by never joining your sponsoring employer you are violating/contradicting the primary intent of Employment based AOS application which can lead to revoking of your GC in future or it might cause problems during your naturalization
hair Eye Makeup Tips For Blue Eyes
jangolouis
03-19 10:55 AM
I went for H1B stamping, but i know a friend of mine went for F1 (PhD) extension and had to go through the same process. I called Dept. of State multiple times, dont expect a polite response. They may even say it may take years. Thats what they told me the day before i got the visa. Dont worry your wife will get the visa eventually. Tell her to enjoy India in the mean time like i did on my forced vacation.
more...
injrav
03-21 01:51 PM
Thanks you. The minimum donation online is $50. Yo have to scroll down for one time contributions, below to the 6th or 7th one in the dropdown.
Thanks for quick reply
I donated 50$ through pay pal.
Your receipt number for this payment is: 46xx-xxxx-xxxx-0287
Thanks for quick reply
I donated 50$ through pay pal.
Your receipt number for this payment is: 46xx-xxxx-xxxx-0287
hot makeup blue eyes. Eye Makeup
lacrossegc
12-11 08:52 PM
Hey how about putting in an ad in craig's list for IV. This would draw more members and hopefully more contributions
more...
house lue smokey eye makeup.
ksairi
07-31 10:21 PM
http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1819
July 30, 2007
Washington, D.C. � Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) today introduced a bill to void the recent increases in immigration fees by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The bill would void the new fee structure set to take effect today and reinstate the previous fee structure. The bill also states that USCIS has consistently failed to reduce application backlogs and has suffered from a lack of transparency and effective management.
�Our immigration services need to move into the 21st century,� stated Rep. Zoe Lofgren. �But, USCIS has consistently failed to explain or justify the amounts and distributions of this new fee increase. While I agree that USCIS needs to modernize its existing infrastructure and procedures, they must do so in a transparent and open manner. After repeated requests over several months, USCIS has yet to provide Congress with a detailed plan for its infrastructure modernization efforts. Our immigration system should be both effective and fair; sacrificing one to achieve the other should not be an option.�
Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren is serving her seventh term in Congress representing most of the City of San Jose and Santa Clara County. She serves as Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law. She also Chairs the House Administration Subcommittee on Elections and serves on the House Homeland Security Committee. Congresswoman Lofgren is Chair of the California Democratic Congressional Delegation consisting of 34 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives from California.
July 30, 2007
Washington, D.C. � Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) today introduced a bill to void the recent increases in immigration fees by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The bill would void the new fee structure set to take effect today and reinstate the previous fee structure. The bill also states that USCIS has consistently failed to reduce application backlogs and has suffered from a lack of transparency and effective management.
�Our immigration services need to move into the 21st century,� stated Rep. Zoe Lofgren. �But, USCIS has consistently failed to explain or justify the amounts and distributions of this new fee increase. While I agree that USCIS needs to modernize its existing infrastructure and procedures, they must do so in a transparent and open manner. After repeated requests over several months, USCIS has yet to provide Congress with a detailed plan for its infrastructure modernization efforts. Our immigration system should be both effective and fair; sacrificing one to achieve the other should not be an option.�
Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren is serving her seventh term in Congress representing most of the City of San Jose and Santa Clara County. She serves as Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law. She also Chairs the House Administration Subcommittee on Elections and serves on the House Homeland Security Committee. Congresswoman Lofgren is Chair of the California Democratic Congressional Delegation consisting of 34 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives from California.
tattoo Blue eyes, green eyeshadow,
bekugc
08-06 05:39 PM
whether you are in h1 or h4, it is important you maintain 'good standing' of whatever status you are in. if u dont have a job, change to H4, so that ur earlier h1 record remains clean (as long as u had H1, u got paid and have proof of pay /employment experience)
when you get ur offer down the line, if that company sponsors h1 for you, at that time theyll collect ur experience letters and proof and go for the H1. if the h1 sponsor is a different company, Im do not really think it is treated as a "renewal" since ur status as H1 has ended when u changed to H4. It may be treated as a "fresh h1 sponsor/transfer" for you.
However, you do not have to worry about the annual h1 quota in ur case even tho u have lost ur H1 status. you are included in the exception clause - "Those beneficiaries not subject to the annual quota are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years and have not been outside the United States for more than 365 consecutive days"
so basically, according to me, if ur employment record is clean and if the new sponsor's requirements meets proper H1 guidelines, you can get back on H1.
im not an attorney..so the regular warning applies!
when you get ur offer down the line, if that company sponsors h1 for you, at that time theyll collect ur experience letters and proof and go for the H1. if the h1 sponsor is a different company, Im do not really think it is treated as a "renewal" since ur status as H1 has ended when u changed to H4. It may be treated as a "fresh h1 sponsor/transfer" for you.
However, you do not have to worry about the annual h1 quota in ur case even tho u have lost ur H1 status. you are included in the exception clause - "Those beneficiaries not subject to the annual quota are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years and have not been outside the United States for more than 365 consecutive days"
so basically, according to me, if ur employment record is clean and if the new sponsor's requirements meets proper H1 guidelines, you can get back on H1.
im not an attorney..so the regular warning applies!
more...
pictures Blue Eyes
sanju_dba
11-10 03:10 PM
waiting for some IVan with tareek clip
it was about remembering just my Birthday date... now..
PD Date
VB Date
EAD expiry date
H1B expiry date ( ETA9035E date,reciept date,approval date )
if you have vacation , then POE date .
I94 date,
... any thing else to add ?
it was about remembering just my Birthday date... now..
PD Date
VB Date
EAD expiry date
H1B expiry date ( ETA9035E date,reciept date,approval date )
if you have vacation , then POE date .
I94 date,
... any thing else to add ?
dresses Eye Makeup For Blue Eyes. eye
bsbawa10
04-16 01:45 PM
I have recently filled the USCIS survey. But I am not satisfied with all the questions they have. I want to tell what we want to tell (not what they want to hear)
I have an idea to send USCIS director information about how they are doing ? (In terms of delays, consistency, customer service, implementation, transparency). This will not cost any dime to anybody and at the same time make an impact.
Step One:
One of us can first create a survey on survery monkey (detailed one..with complete description about various aspects of USCIS) . I have created a Draft of the questions which can go in the survey. You can add more (Please do not delete the existing ones).
The real survey can contain scale of measurement (1 to 10) and also descriptive comments. I can keep the draft open for 10 days before creating/publishing the real survey so that everybody can contribute to creating it. Here is the link to the draft (feel free to add more questions which are to the point and can make an impact)
USCIS Survey (Draft) - Google Docs (http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATAcM7NSTN8WZGQ0dmtjbW1fMTYxNTgyMjdwaGM&hl=en)
Step Two:
Open/Publish the survery to Immigration Voice users and all other customers of USCIS(Advertise this on the other websites too). We can keep it open for 10 days to get everybody's participation.
Step Three.
Get the results and and send the results to the USCIS director(These will contain ratings of where USCIS stands and suggestions for improvements). We can also send them to the President. This has to be a collaborative effort and will only cost .44 cents stamp(not .44 cents each but .44cents only)
I do not think they measure themselves at all (right now whatever they do is right).
I think this is nice gift to USCIS which they need desperatly. Also it could be an eye opener.
Any suggestions to this would be welcome.
I have an idea to send USCIS director information about how they are doing ? (In terms of delays, consistency, customer service, implementation, transparency). This will not cost any dime to anybody and at the same time make an impact.
Step One:
One of us can first create a survey on survery monkey (detailed one..with complete description about various aspects of USCIS) . I have created a Draft of the questions which can go in the survey. You can add more (Please do not delete the existing ones).
The real survey can contain scale of measurement (1 to 10) and also descriptive comments. I can keep the draft open for 10 days before creating/publishing the real survey so that everybody can contribute to creating it. Here is the link to the draft (feel free to add more questions which are to the point and can make an impact)
USCIS Survey (Draft) - Google Docs (http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATAcM7NSTN8WZGQ0dmtjbW1fMTYxNTgyMjdwaGM&hl=en)
Step Two:
Open/Publish the survery to Immigration Voice users and all other customers of USCIS(Advertise this on the other websites too). We can keep it open for 10 days to get everybody's participation.
Step Three.
Get the results and and send the results to the USCIS director(These will contain ratings of where USCIS stands and suggestions for improvements). We can also send them to the President. This has to be a collaborative effort and will only cost .44 cents stamp(not .44 cents each but .44cents only)
I do not think they measure themselves at all (right now whatever they do is right).
I think this is nice gift to USCIS which they need desperatly. Also it could be an eye opener.
Any suggestions to this would be welcome.
more...
makeup Blue Eyes
desi3933
03-25 11:56 AM
Yes, as long as the derivative I-485 is submitted before the primary applicant receives approval of his I-485.
Incorrect!
Her I-485 does not need to filed before his I-485 approval. She can file for her I-485 when PD is current and maintaining valid visa status (or out of status < 180 days) at the time of filing of her I-485.
___________________
Not a legal advice.
Incorrect!
Her I-485 does not need to filed before his I-485 approval. She can file for her I-485 when PD is current and maintaining valid visa status (or out of status < 180 days) at the time of filing of her I-485.
___________________
Not a legal advice.
girlfriend lue eye makeup
augustus
06-17 07:00 PM
Dear All,
Can you please let me know if the sealed medical report will be given to you by the doctor? or will it be mailed by the doctor to lawyer?
Can you please let me know if the sealed medical report will be given to you by the doctor? or will it be mailed by the doctor to lawyer?
hairstyles Green Yellow amp; Blue Eyes
bigboy007
04-09 08:26 PM
Well they are always saying they "want to start" discussions things can turn quick if they want to ... But the point is whether we "in" or are we "out" of discussions if we have atleast one point representation in those talks I think there would some help instead of asking all of us to go back and start process again, this is what 2007 CIR did and it would be if we do nothing... For me I have sent emails / calls when HR XYZA legislation of Lofgren was in discussions.. but those are small numbers and I wonder whether IV Core is doing something through their Lobbying channels... Surely its coming if not today during the tenure of President Obama.
go_guy123
02-18 04:18 PM
Canada has been using this for skilled worker program, where individuals can apply for Canadian permanent residency independently if they fullfill the passmark. Other countries like Australia, UK and New Zealand also follow suit with different types of difficulties.
How about US? Would US adopt this?
G.
Point system can be adopted but either way it has to be strict so that
the eligible people are lesser, like giving points for work exp in US etc(onL1
or H1b).
Aust system is also pretty strict and only people who are working/studying in Aust can qualify.
Any system that delinks the employer - GC sponsering system will reduuce the problems to some extent. but retrogression will be there if
too many people apply.
How about US? Would US adopt this?
G.
Point system can be adopted but either way it has to be strict so that
the eligible people are lesser, like giving points for work exp in US etc(onL1
or H1b).
Aust system is also pretty strict and only people who are working/studying in Aust can qualify.
Any system that delinks the employer - GC sponsering system will reduuce the problems to some extent. but retrogression will be there if
too many people apply.
amitga
11-17 07:25 PM
It totally electronic.
No comments:
Post a Comment